My academic work centers on understanding the epistemic foundations of scientific knowledge, specifically focused on philosophical issues surrounding scientific realism and the historical development of classical electrodynamics.
Rather than adjudicating the debate on purely epistemic grounds, I explored the pragmatic motivations for adopting either position. What does it mean for working scientists — and for society — when we commit to one view over another?
Scientific Realism — The view that our best scientific theories describe reality as it actually is
Anti-Realism — Skepticism about whether theories reveal truth, or merely "save the phenomena"
Pragmatic Turn — Shifting focus from epistemics to the practical consequences of our commitments
"What hangs on taking science literally? And what do we lose when we don't?"